Masterpiece
*****
Excellent
**** 1/2
Very good
****
Good
**** 1/2
Just okay
***
Not for me
**
Definitely not for me
*

Ratings conundrum

Ratings, ratings.  This is my first year blogging and rating books.  As I look over my list of books I’ve read this year, I’m not happy with some of the ratings I’ve done.  I try to compare each book I read with others (obviously!) to see where I would place it.  I’ve found that some books that I’ve given a “4″ should really be a “3.5″.  There are quite a few I would change to 1/2 point to even one point less.  I don’t think there are any that would increase.

What are the ethics of this?  I guess it’s my blog and I can do what I want to, but should I really change my ratings?  I could list all the ones I changed and the reasons why.  Should I just start from here and leave my former ratings alone, or is it acceptable to go back and change a few as long as I explain myself.

Comments from the peanut gallery are welcome.

Summer Reading Challenge–Completed!!

COMPLETED!!

I just had to join this challenge, too! This is only the 16th! challenge I’m currently participating in.

I have decided to read 4 books that have won the Man Booker Prize. My choices are:

1. The Bone People by Keri Hulme (for BookAwards reading group)

2. The Blind Assassin by Margaret Atwood (for BookAwards reading group)

3. The God of Small Things by Arundhati Roy (for BookAwards reading group)

4. The Sea by John Banville (personal TBR list)

Bonus/Alternates:

5. The Life of Pi by Yann Martel (personal TBR list)

6. Possession by A.S. Byatt (personal TBR list)

Blog Widget by LinkWithin