Masterpiece
*****
Excellent
**** 1/2
Very good
****
Good
**** 1/2
Just okay
***
Not for me
**
Definitely not for me
*

Review: Oryx and Crake

oryx.JPGI love Margaret Atwood, but Oryx and Crake was just too gritty for my taste. This was compounded by the fact that I listened to it on audio. Hearing the graphic descriptions was even worse than reading it.  This was my fifth Atwood, and by far my least favorite.

The narrator is Jimmy, code-named Snowman.  Crake is a sort of Dr. Moreau figure, while Oryx is a woman caught between the two.  I don’t want to give away too many details for those who still want to read it, but if you’re squeamish about graphic s*xu*l situations (including child p*r*o*raphy), I would advise against it.  I didn’t get why it had to have that element to the story.  I also wondered why the title of the book was named that way, but in the end, I guess it was because Oryx and Crake were the two most influential figures in Jimmy’s life.

I would recommend reading other Atwoods before this one.  The Handmaid’s Tale, Cat’s Eye, and The Penelopiad are my favorites so far.

2003, 378 pp.
stars2.gif

The Sea by John Banville

The Sea
by John Banville

2005, 195 pp.

2005 Booker Prize

Rating: 2

This was not my cup of tea. I don’t need an exciting plot to enjoy a book. I don’t mind older men looking back on their lives. In a similar vein, I loved Marilynne Robinson’s Gilead, although I hated Roth’s Everyman. This was closer to Everyman.

Max is a widower that is overly sensitive to smells who is grieving (I guess?) over his wife. He calls her the “c” word and admits he really didn’t know her because he preferred not to know her.

Not one character in the book was likable. I guess I was lucky this was short.

1. Joy – July 6, 2007
Ahhh, I just added this onto my iPod! I didn’t like EVERYMAN either, so you not liking this one is not a good sign for me.
2. Petunia – July 11, 2007
I had the same reaction as you did. Didn’t care for it.

Grendel by John Gardner

Grendel
by John Gardner
1971
174 pp.

Rating: 2

I didn’t like this book. AT ALL. I absolutely love Beowulf, and I highly recommend reading or listening to Seamus Heaney’s version. Whereas Beowulf could almost be considered a Christian work, Grendel is nihilistic. Enough said.

booklogged – April 13, 2007
Thanks for the warning, 3M. Every once in awhile it’s refreshing to come across a review that doesn’t compel me to add the book to my list. Just sorry you had to waste your time reading it.
Carl V. – April 13, 2007
So….you didn’t like it then? ;)I like the cover, at least.
Daphne – April 14, 2007
What is that on the cover??
Quixotic – April 18, 2007
I have this on my list of things to read. I too love Beowulf, and Seamus Heaney’s version is excellent. I guess I’ll have to see what I make of Grendel!